Nnamdi Kanu Fails to Halt Judgment in Alleged Terrorism Trial at Abuja Court
Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was unable to prevent the judgment in his alleged terrorism trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja. Justice James Omotosho presided over the trial, where Kanu objected to the delivery of judgment, citing various motions pending in court.
Kanu claimed bias and insisted on valid charges. However, the judge overruled his objections, ruling that the charges were valid.
The trial proceeded despite Kanu's objections, leading to tensions in the courtroom.
Plus234Feed summary based on reporting from This Day. Read the original report below.
Read full article
Continue on This Day
Get the week in one email
Top stories, NPFL results, the naira — every Friday morning. Free, one email a week.
Related Stories
Kanu Fails to Open Defense Again in Terrorism Trial, Court Adjourns
Nnamdi Kanu's Legal Strategy Criticized as Risky in Terrorism Trial
Nnamdi Kanu Declares Self-Representation as Lawyers Withdraw in Terrorism Trial
Federal High Court to Deliver Judgment in Nnamdi Kanu's Alleged Terrorism Trial
Kanu Abandons Witness Plan in Terrorism Trial, Court Adjourns for Decision
Nigerian Court Convicts Nnamdi Kanu on Terrorism Charges
Get Plus234Feed on messaging apps
Same headlines, delivered where you already scroll.
