Concerns Over Section 134(3) of Nigeria's Electoral Act

The article examines Section 134(3) of the 2022 Electoral Act (EA) in Nigeria, which addresses the qualifications and disqualifications of candidates for elections. It critiques the proposal to delete this section, arguing that it could undermine the ability to challenge candidates who may not meet constitutional qualifications, such as those with forged certificates.
The author emphasizes that the Electoral Act should improve upon, rather than remove, this provision to ensure that unsuitable candidates can be weeded out. It highlights the legal burden of proof required to substantiate allegations of forgery, referencing several Supreme Court cases, including ACN v.
Lamido and Okon v. PDP, which illustrate the challenges faced in proving such claims.
The article concludes that the current provisions may not effectively address the issue of candidates presenting forged certificates and calls for a more robust framework to uphold electoral integrity.
Plus234Feed summary based on reporting from This Day. Read the original report below.
Read full article
Continue on This Day
Get the week in one email
Top stories, NPFL results, the naira — every Friday morning. Free, one email a week.
Related Stories

Electoral Act 2026: Certificate Forgery and Disqualification

ADC Chieftain Critiques N’Assembly on Electoral Act Changes

Major Changes in Nigeria's 2026 Electoral Act Explained
Concerns Rise Over Credibility of Nigeria's FCT Elections

Yusuf Warns Against Changes to Electoral Act's Integrity

Yoruba Ronu Forum Critiques NASS on Electoral Act 2026
Get Plus234Feed on messaging apps
Same headlines, delivered where you already scroll.






