Historical Context of Judicial Adjudication in Nigeria
Fola Aiyegbusi discusses the perception that judicial adjudication in electoral matters is a recent phenomenon in Nigeria. He references statements made by a former head of state who criticized the courts' role in elections, labeling their verdicts as “Cathedral judgements.” Aiyegbusi argues that this trend is not new, tracing back to the Second Republic in 1979 when the Supreme Court affirmed Alhaji Shehu Shagari's presidency.
He recalls the electoral landscape of that time, where Shagari of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) faced off against Chief Obafemi Awolowo of the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) and Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe of the Nigeria People’s Party (NPP), among others. Aiyegbusi notes that Awolowo challenged the election results despite not securing enough votes, highlighting the complexities of electoral law and the historical context of judicial involvement in Nigeria's political processes.
Plus234Feed summary based on reporting from Premium Times. Read the original report below.
Read full article
Continue on Premium Times
Get the week in one email
Top stories, NPFL results, the naira — every Friday morning. Free, one email a week.
Related Stories

Trust in Nigeria's Judiciary Ahead of 2027 Elections

Falana Advocates Limited Judicial Role in Elections

Ex-NBA President Osigwe Critiques Courts' Role in Elections

Osigwe Critiques Nigeria's Electoral Process at Editors Conference
Evolution of Nigeria's Political Campaigns Since 1979

Jonathan Warns Excessive Election Litigation Weakens Democracy
Get Plus234Feed on messaging apps
Same headlines, delivered where you already scroll.






