US Court Reviews Tinubu Presidency Statement on FBI Records

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia is reviewing a public statement from the Nigerian Presidency in the case Greenspan v. Executive Office for U.S.
Attorneys et al., concerning FBI and DEA records related to President Bola Tinubu. The lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York has filed to participate as amicus curiae, asserting that the Presidency's public comments should influence the court's decision on Tinubu's privacy claims.
The firm contends that one cannot invoke privacy in court while simultaneously discussing the same records publicly. They noted that the FBI has requested to keep sensitive wiretap recordings confidential, which allegedly include Tinubu's voice connected to heroin-trafficking investigations.
The firm acknowledged that their interpretation of the documents is speculative, particularly regarding Tinubu being the only living person identified in the investigation. The FBI is relying on FOIA Exemption 3 and Sections 2510–2520 of Title 18 of the US Code to protect the wiretap material.
Plus234Feed summary based on reporting from Politics Nigeria. Read the original report below.
Read full article
Continue on Politics Nigeria
Enjoy this article?
Get the weekly Nigerian roundup — top stories, NPFL, naira. One email, Sunday morning.
Related Stories
Tinubu Seeks to Block Release of FBI, DEA Records

FBI Seeks to Block Release of Wiretap Records on Tinubu

Tinubu Faces Legal Battle Over Drug Trafficking Allegations

Tinubu Challenges Release of US Investigation Records

FBI and DEA Review Records on Tinubu's Allegations

FBI Seeks Court Approval to Withhold Tinubu Records
Get Plus234Feed on messaging apps
Same headlines, delivered where you already scroll.









