Supreme Court Rules on Federal High Court's Jurisdiction

On June 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of Nigeria, presided over by Justices Uwani Musa Abba Aji, Emmanuel Akomay Agim, Chioma Egondu Nwosu, Stephen Jonah Adah, and Jamilu Yammama Tukur, addressed an appeal concerning the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court in a case involving trespass to land. The appellant, represented by Imen Okoti, sought relief for damages amounting to N75,194,886.13 due to the construction of an oil pipeline on their land without consent.
The trial court had previously ruled in favor of the appellant, but the Court of Appeal later found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to determine the suit. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, emphasizing that the Federal High Court does not have jurisdiction over matters concerning land title disputes and that the case should have been heard in a state high court.
The ruling clarified the limitations of the Federal High Court's jurisdiction under Section 251(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) and Section 7(1) of the Federal High Court Act.
Plus234Feed summary based on reporting from This Day. Read the original report below.
Read full article
Continue on This Day
Get the week in one email
Top stories, NPFL results, the naira — every Friday morning. Free, one email a week.
Related Stories

Supreme Court Rules on Jurisdiction in Debt Recovery Case

Supreme Court of Nigeria Addresses Land Dispute Jurisdiction and Ownership Issues

Court Orders Release of N100.1m Judgment Against Police
Court Rejects Suit Against ICPC Investigation Authority

Court Orders Nigerian Navy to Vacate Port Harcourt Property

Federal High Court Announces Easter Vacation Dates 2026
Get Plus234Feed on messaging apps
Same headlines, delivered where you already scroll.






